Saturday, 12 July 2014

July Talk

On behalf of Sydney Atheists, I would like to say a very big thank you to Dr Andrew Morrison .

Andrew's talk titled "Child abuse by religious institutions exposed and addressed" covered what religious institutions have done to avoid responsibility and liability for child abuse as well as the ongoing Royal Commission into child sexual abuse. The evening was a great success. The topic was a very melancholy and distressing one that questioned the morality of the Catholic Church in particular. Andrew's presentation of the topic was very informative, enlightening and thorough. For those that missed the evening, we expect to have it on our Youtube channel soon.

August Talk

Our August talk will be another blockbuster with John McCarthy OA, one of Australia's pre-eminent ambassadors whose topic will be "The influence of religion in the affairs of selected countries". John will discuss how religion, religious leaders and the religions of politicians affect the policy of government and the media in countries such as India, Indonesia, Mexico, Thailand, Japan and the USA. John will also discuss the changes of belief in the various populations.

For more information and to RSVP for this talk, please go to:  http://www.meetup.com/sydneyatheists/events/180330642/

Tuesday, 8 July 2014

A Fracking Fortune Gets Political

Peter Montgomery looks at the role of political donors in funding the American Religious Right
A Fracking Fortune Gets Political
Flickr/Ervins Strauhmanis
Televangelist James Robison recntly declared that he’s praying for a merger of the Tea Party and the religious right. Is he kidding? That merger is well underway. And it’s getting a hefty push from a couple of billionaire brothers.


No, not Charles and David Koch. Brothers Farris and Dan Wilks, who reaped a fortune off the fracking gold rush and cashed in their Texas-based company a few years ago for more than $3 billion. In addition to buying up vast swaths of land in the West, they’re “using the riches that the Lord has blessed them with to back specific goals,” as Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody puts it.
What are those goals? They’ve embraced both the anti-government politics of the Koch brothers and the religious right’s anti-gay, anti-choice cultural warfare. The Wilks brothers belong to Pastors and Pews, an organization connected to Christian-nation extremist David Lane, who wants to make the Bible a primary public school textbook.
Dan Wilks told Brody that we need to “bring the Bible back into the school, and start teaching our kids at a younger age.” Adds brother Farris: “They’re being taught the other ideas, the gay agenda, every day out in the world so we have to stand up and explain to them that that’s not real, that’s not proper, it’s not right.”
The brothers and their wives have followed in the footsteps of other far-right funders and set up foundations. Together they’ve funded them to the tune of more than $200 million. In 2011 and 2012 they gave away millions, both to churches and to culture-war political groups. More than $5.5 million buttressed groups in the Koch brothers’ political networks.
Another $4 million or so funded leading organizations in the religious right political movement, Focus on the Family and the Family Research Council. Another big chunk — more than $4 million — enriched anti-abortion groups. The brothers support a network of “pregnancy centers” that refuse to talk to single women about contraception and require married women to check with their husbands and pastors before discussing birth control.
The Wilks family also backs conservative politicians. They made a splash in Montana, where they own a lot of land and gave more to Republican legislative candidates than anyone else in 2012. In Texas, they’ve backed both Governor Rick Perry and Attorney General Greg Abbott, the Republican aiming to replace him. At the federal level, the brothers and their wives together contributed $125,000 to Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign.
The brothers’ worldview seems to draw heavily on the teachings of a church founded by their father, which combines Biblical literalism with a heavy emphasis on the Old Testament. According to church doctrine, abortion is “murder,” including when it ends pregnancies resulting from rape and incest. And homosexuality is “a serious crime — a very grievous sin.”
Farris is a pastor of the church. In his sermons, he decries “socialism” and argues that the Bible was grounded in the free market. He urges congregants not to vote for candidates who promise “free this, free that,” saying “Yahweh never intended for us as a people to be afraid and reliant on government.” He has suggested that the melting of the icecaps might be punishment for sin, and that President Barack Obama’s re-election may be a harbinger of the “end times.”
Since Obama’s election, conservative political strategists have made him a rallying point in their efforts to merge the energies of two wings of the conservative movement, the religious fundamentalist wing and the anti-government wing. Their success at bringing the Tea Party faithful and religious right movements together is embodied in funders like Farris and Dan Wilks as well as politicians like Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican elected in 2012.
The result is a more extreme, and more powerful, right-wing movement that threatens our nation’s well-being by seeking to undermine the separation of church and state, opposing equality under the law for all Americans, and limiting the ability of the federal government to regulate corporate behavior and promote the common good.
Peter Montgomery is a senior fellow at People For the American Way Foundation where he leads the organization’s research and writing on the Religious Right. This article was originally published at OtherWords.org

Thursday, 19 June 2014

Breaking News - Commonwealth finding of school chaplaincy program struck down in High Court

The High Court has upheld a challenge to the National School Chaplaincy Program, ruling the law used to maintain Commonwealth funding for chaplains is unconstitutional.

Ron Williams (ABC News)
Despite the court challenge, the program was allocated nearly $250 million in this year's federal budget, to be spent over four years.

As Ann Twomey noted after the first constitutional challenge, "This Bill, in a bald-faced manner, rejects the fundamental propositions put by the High Court in the Williams case. The Commonwealth is clearly asking for another clobbering by the Court."

The High Court summed up their decision in a statement reading
Today the High Court unanimously decided that legislation enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament which purported to provide legislative authority to make agreements for the outlay of public money, and to make payments under those agreements, is invalid in its operation with respect to a funding agreement between the Commonwealth and Scripture Union Queensland ("SUQ"). By that agreement, the Commonwealth was to pay SUQ to provide chaplaincy services at schools in Queensland...
 The Court held that, in their operation with respect to the challenged funding agreement and the challenged payments made under that agreement, none of the challenged provisions is a valid law of the Commonwealth. The provisions are not, in their relevant operation, supported by a head of legislative power under the Constitution. Providing at a school the services of a chaplain or welfare worker for the objective described in the FMA Regulations is not a provision of "benefits to students" within the meaning of s 51(xxiiiA) of the Constitution. The Court further held that the Commonwealth's entry into, and expenditure of money under, the funding agreement was not supported by the executive power of the Commonwealth. The making of the payments was therefore held to be unlawful. 
The High Court decision found that the "expenditure of monies under, the SUQ Funding Agreement" was not supported by the executive power of the Commonwealth.

It's time to tell your MPs and Senators to end the National School Chplaincy Program for good, and to give funding to the states to run their own counselling programs though their education budgets.

Wednesday, 18 June 2014

It's time to end the National School Chaplaincy Program

The National School Chaplaincy Program was quickly hatched as a pork barrel to conservative Christians by John Howard in 2006. The program has been controversial since its inception, with teachers, counsellors and psychologists opposed to poorly qualified chaplains having access to vulnerable young students.

Shortly before the 2010 election, Julia Gillard pledged to Jim Wallace that the NSCP would continue its "unique flavour though its link to the Christian faith." In 2011, 96.5% of school chaplains were Chrisitan, while only 61.1% of the population marked "Christian" in the census that year.

Peter Garrett has admitted that the NSCP had problems with evangelism, requiring "significant guideline changes" to protect children from "churches with their mission to evangelise." Garrett stated "the line between chaplains acting to support students in the provision of general pastoral care and proselytising was too easily crossed."

The Australian Education Union has criticised the fact that 100,000 students with disabilities do not get the financial support they need, while funding for exclusively religious chaplains is prioritised. The Australian Psychological Society slammed the NSCP funding decision as "appalling." A spokesman stated "There are no reasonable standards of quality of training for people who take on essentially counselling roles in the school situation."

Today, the Black Dog Institute and Mission Australia released a report finding that one in five young people struggle with a mental illness, but few seek help. With studies finding that poorly qualified counsellors can give harmful advice, the government desperately needs to invest more money in supporting the mental health of young Australians with qualified mental health professionals, not enthusiastic missionaries.

Already 189,000 Australians have signed a petition calling on the government to cut funding to anti-gay chaplains. Senator Louise Pratt has outlined the problems with chaplaincy that have been aired by current and former school students:

My best friend was getting bullied by other students last year for being gay, so went to speak to our school chaplain about it. ... He suffers from anxiety and depression, has attempted suicide in the past and occasionally self-harms. He spoke to our chaplain about being bullied and about how he has begun to believe what people are saying about him being a 'fag' and 'a disgusting, gay idiot'. ... The chaplain told him that his bullies were right and that homosexuality is a degrading sin that sends people to hell. .... That night I got a phone call from his Mum telling me he had tried to overdose on medicine pills and was in hospital having his stomach pumped.  
And here is another:
... this term the Chaplain warned us against ... non-marital sex. When I asked him about what a lesbian couple of faith would do if they couldn't get married, he simply replied that gay and lesbian people could never be proper Christians. … He went on to talk about how ... gays and lesbians were ... unnatural, indecent and perverse. ... this event made me feel as if my sexuality was something to be ashamed of. I consider myself a strong person, and for this to affect me so deeply made me realise the dangers of mixing religion with public education.

Polls have found that only 5% of Australians want the government to remove secular welfare workers from the scheme. In 2012, the the High Court found that funding arrangements with Scripture Union Queensland were beyond the executive power of the Commonwealth. Legislation was quickly rushed though the parliament in order to bypass the court's decision.

The High Court will hand down a new decision on the legality of the funding arrangements tomorrow.

Sydney Atheists calls on the government to scrap the National School Chaplaincy Program, and to properly support children with disabilities, and fund qualified mental health professionals to give professional help to vulnerable young students.

We urge our members to contact their NSW representatives with any concerns about the program.


Wednesday, 4 June 2014

Leo Igwe - Stopping Witch Burning In Kenya?

Last Sunday, a 45 year old woman, Christine Jemeli Koech, was accused of witchcraft. A neighbour claimed that Koech, a mother of six had been responsible for her child's illness. A local mob stormed Koech's house early in the morning while she was asleep. They murdered her and burnt her body. This gruesome practice of lynching continues in the East African country of Kenya.

According to media reports, the neighbour has been arrested but the people who carried out the killing are still at large. Witch burning is common in Kenya and in other parts of the region. Men and women accused of bewitching people are executed by a lynch mob. Some years ago, a graphic video of 'witches' being burnt in Kenya was circulated on the internet. It attracted international outrage and condemnation.

It drew the attention of the world to the scale of the problem in Kenya and in other parts of Africa. People in Kenya engage in witch burning with apparent impunity. People who attack and lynch 'witches' more often than not get away with their crimes. This has to stop. The government of Kenya needs to take a proactive rather than its current reactive approach to combat the accusation of witchcraft and the burning of witches in their country.

Very often, whenever there is a case of witch killing, the police respond and make some arrests. But afterwards nothing is heard about the case again. The matter just dies away. The government of Kenya needs to send a strong message to families of victims that they can get justice. And to those who may want to indulge in witch burning, Kenya authorities should let them know that they will be made to answer for their crimes.

Note, this post contains a graphic image some may find disturbing.